4 December 2020PatentsMuireann Bolger

Apple and Intel weigh in on SCOTUS Arthrex review

Apple and Intel, along with tech and IP groups, are urging the US Supreme Court to retain an administrative process for challenging patents.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

Rejected post-Arthrex bids signal uncertainty over USPTO director’s authority

5 August 2021 Early signs show that US v Arthrex is unlikely to herald a spate of inter partes reviews, but may fuel uncertainty around the scope of the acting USPTO director’s role, lawyers have told WIPR.

Patents

USPTO reveals post-Arthrex review process

30 June 2021 As a result of the recent Supreme Court decision in US v Arthrex, the US Patent and Trademark Office issued new interim procedures on Tuesday, June 29, that give the office’s director the authority to rehear final Patent Trial and Appeal Board rulings.

Patents

Arthrex: ‘patents have become more political’

22 June 2021 In a decision highly anticipated by patent owners, the US Supreme Court has delivered its final ruling in US v Arthrex—a fractured opinion that lawyers say leaves burning questions around its political implications.

UK-India trade deal is ‘missed opportunity’, say industry bodies

WATCH: Recent developments in design patent law

SEPs now searchable on WIPO’s global patent database

INTA 2025: San Diego to host largest post-COVID Annual Meeting

'Nothing can stand in the way of our work': Ukraine resumes IP system

Foley adds five-partner team from Perkins Coie and K&L Gates

WATCH: Finding a new balance in IP protection with trade secret protection

Optis v Apple: How the court calculated the royalty rate

Apple and Intel weigh in on SCOTUS Arthrex review

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles