• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • UK launches consultation on orphan works
iporeport
The IPO office at Concept House, in Newport.
14 January 2014Copyright

UK launches consultation on orphan works

The UK government has launched a consultation into proposals for the licensing of orphan works.

The consultation, launched on January 10 by the UK Intellectual Property Office (IPO), seeks views on the legal effectiveness and structure of the proposals, which are currently in draft form.

They aim to enable the reproduction of works when the rights holders cannot be found, provided a “diligent search” has been carried out and a license fee paid.

The report says that the licensing scheme will see the IPO act as an authorising body, where it will “take the role” of the absent rights holder and “look after their interests by licensing and setting money aside.”

How long the IPO will keep the license fees forms part of the consultation.

Specific costs will be mapped out once there is an idea for the demand of the scheme.

Under the current system, if a rights holder cannot be found, the work cannot be used without infringing copyright.

“The current system relies on explicit permission from rights owners but there are inevitably people who simply cannot be found,” the report says.

“This means that there is a risk that their work may be reproduced without their permission and without any of the financial benefit returning to them.”

“Given that a licence will only be issued after a diligent search, the likelihood of the rights holder being found after the work is used is low,” it says, adding that if an original author reappears, they will be paid and regain control and use of their work.

The proposals form part of the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013.

Lord Younger, the UK’s IP minister, said a successful orphan works scheme would help reduce copyright infringement as well as helping owners make money. It would also, he said, make more of the UK’s “considerable cultural and creative capital.”

“This consultation is your chance to influence the UK’s plans for implementing both its own scheme for licensing orphan works use and the European Union (EU) Directive (2012/28/EU),” Younger added.

The directive, which is incorporated into the plans, would allow publicly accessible archives to digitise certain works and to display them on their websites for access across the EU.

An IPO spokesperson said: "The government is currently consulting on how the orphan works scheme will operate and will announce the next steps in due course.”

The closing date for comments on the proposals is February 28.

The Government intends to publish a summary of responses within three months and the amended regulations will be set out in Parliament at a later date.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk




Editor's picks

Stability attacks Getty’s ‘confected’ case in closing arguments
Artificial Intelligence
Stability attacks Getty’s ‘confected’ case in closing arguments
3 July 2025

Editor's picks

Artificial Intelligence
Stability attacks Getty’s ‘confected’ case in closing arguments
3 July 2025
Trademarks
Ferrari wins Testarossa classic car case at EU court
2 July 2025
Patents
‘We created law’: G1/24 and the creation of the ‘diamond standard’
1 July 2025
Patents
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
20 June 2025
AI
What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?
20 June 2025
Future of IP
‘Sad beige’ lawsuit shows how hard it is for influencers to stand out
20 June 2025

More articles

Stability attacks Getty’s ‘confected’ case in closing arguments
‘Once is good enough’: Getty closing arguments rely on scant evidence
Tech litigators join Hogan Lovells’ Paris practice from A&O Shearman
Getty v Stability AI: Five takeaways from the courtroom so far
Defending the realm: How a key MoD supplier crafts its IP strategy
What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?
Stamped out: What was in the US Copyright Office AI report?
Third Circ grants first ‘fair use’ AI and copyright appeal in Thomson v ROSS

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin