• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • New laws to protect IP in Vietnam come under fire
shutterstock-89381566-web
13 August 2013Copyright

New laws to protect IP in Vietnam come under fire

Controversial new measures aimed at protecting IP rights in Vietnam have attracted criticism from US officials.

Last month, the Vietnamese government set-out various new measures aimed at improving IP protection and stamping out plagiarism.

The law, known as Decree 72 but officially called ‘Management, Provision, Use of Internet Services and Information Content Online’, was signed by Prime Minister Nguyen Tan Dung on July 15.

However, it was only made public last week.

Under Decree 72, individuals will not be allowed to quote information from newspapers, press agencies, or other state-owned websites online.

Social media would also be restricted to purely exchanging personal information.

But the US embassy in capital city Hanoi has hit back at the plans.

Claiming the decree is inconsistent with Vietnam’s obligations to protect civil and political rights, it said in a statement, “… fundamental freedoms apply online just as they do offline. We are deeply concerned by the decree’s provisions. In addition this decree will limit the development of Vietnam’s budding IT sector by hampering domestic innovation and deterring foreign investment.”

Vietnam is one of a number of countries seeking to join the US-sponsored Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), an international trade agreement.

One of the requirements of joining the TPP is for countries to have strong IP laws and it is thought the measures could be as a result of these negotiations. Japan recently made modifications to its laws as it looked to implement the agreement.

“We have repeatedly raised our concerns about this decree with senior Vietnamese government officials, and we call on the Vietnamese government to respect the right to freedom of expression,” the US embassy added.

Non-profit organisation Reporters Without Borders, which stands up for journalist’s rights around the world, also criticised the laws as “a gross violation of the right to inform and be informed.”

Akash Sachdeva, partner at Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP in London, said he agreed with the concerns and that the new laws could have the potential to be enforced in a “draconian” manner.

“There is absolutely a need to improve IP protection in Vietnam but there is always a risk that laws promulgated for a genuine need can be used in other ways,” said Sachdeva, who previously worked across the South-East Asia region.

“Although the Vietnamese government argues that it is required to protect copyright (and that part may well be true), given Vietnam’s history and human rights’ record there is a genuine and probably justified fear that the decree will be used to restrict free speech and in particular restrict the ability of independent bloggers to share information via social media sites or through the Internet.”

The law is expected to enter into force on September 1.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk




Editor's picks

Stability attacks Getty’s ‘confected’ case in closing arguments
Artificial Intelligence
Stability attacks Getty’s ‘confected’ case in closing arguments
3 July 2025

Editor's picks

Artificial Intelligence
Stability attacks Getty’s ‘confected’ case in closing arguments
3 July 2025
Trademarks
Ferrari wins Testarossa classic car case at EU court
2 July 2025
Patents
‘We created law’: G1/24 and the creation of the ‘diamond standard’
1 July 2025
Patents
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
20 June 2025
AI
What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?
20 June 2025
Future of IP
‘Sad beige’ lawsuit shows how hard it is for influencers to stand out
20 June 2025

More articles

Stability attacks Getty’s ‘confected’ case in closing arguments
‘Once is good enough’: Getty closing arguments rely on scant evidence
Tech litigators join Hogan Lovells’ Paris practice from A&O Shearman
Getty v Stability AI: Five takeaways from the courtroom so far
Defending the realm: How a key MoD supplier crafts its IP strategy
What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?
Stamped out: What was in the US Copyright Office AI report?
Third Circ grants first ‘fair use’ AI and copyright appeal in Thomson v ROSS

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin