Asia leading rapid rise of battery innovation: EPO report
22-09-2020
Dabus team urges EPO to reconsider AI-inventor policy
02-06-2020
23-04-2021
nitpicker / Shutterstock.com
With video conference hearings here to stay, Howard Read of Appleyard Lees sets out what participants need to know when appearing at the European Patent Office.
In oppositions and appeals at the European Patent Office (EPO), oral proceedings may be the final opportunity for a party to present submissions before an adverse decision is announced.
Traditionally, oral proceedings are held on the premises of the EPO, in Munich, The Hague and Berlin. However, since 1998, oral proceedings before the examining division have alternatively been held, typically upon request by a party, by video conference. Previously held using dedicated IP technology, video conferences are now held via Skype for Business or Zoom.
Video conferencing and access to justice
The devastating COVID-19 pandemic transformed adoption of holding oral proceedings by video conference, to sustain access to justice for parties. In 2019, about 900 oral proceedings before the examining divisions were held by video conference, increasing to more than 2,300 in 2020. Additionally, oral proceedings are now routinely held before the opposition divisions and the Boards of Appeal.
In 2020, more than 300 oral proceedings before the opposition divisions were held by video conference and the EPO plans to achieve the same number monthly in 2021. Between May and October 2020, 120 oral proceedings before the Boards of Appeal were held by video conference.
Similarities and differences
The implementing of regulations and conduct of oral proceedings differ between the examining divisions, the opposition divisions and the Boards of Appeal. The following table can be used as a reference guide to how each of these conduct their oral proceedings:
Oral proceedings |
Examining divisions |
Opposition divisions |
Boards of Appeal |
In person |
Serious reasons only |
Serious reasons only (oral proceedings postponed) |
By default (no end date) |
By video conference |
By default (no end date) |
By default (pilot project to 15 September 2021) |
Upon request by a party or of own motion (no end date) |
Mixed or hybrid (in person and by video conference) |
Not known |
Under discussion |
Upon request |
Different locations |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
Technical information |
Skype for Business |
Zoom |
Zoom, Skype for Business |
Recording |
No |
No |
No |
Filing of documents |
|
|
|
Simultaneous translation |
Not applicable |
Yes |
Yes |
Taking of evidence (witnesses) |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
In public |
No |
Yes (generally) |
Yes (generally) |
Adverse decisions
Here are some examples of an adverse decision: refusal of a patent application is an adverse decision for the applicant while revocation is an adverse decision for the proprietor, respectively. Conversely, maintenance of a patent may be an adverse decision for an opponent while maintenance of a patent in amended form maybe an adverse decision for both the proprietor and the opponent. Such adverse decisions may have substantial economic consequences, thereby motivating the respective parties to achieve desired decisions.
Right to be heard
Oral proceedings are fundamental to the right to be heard under article 113 EPC: the decisions of the EPO may only be based on grounds or evidence on which the parties concerned have had an opportunity to present their comments.
“The implementing of regulations and conduct of oral proceedings differ between the examining divisions.”
This is interpreted as not merely the right of a party to present comments but also as the right for the party to have their comments taken into consideration. The right to oral proceedings is codified by article 116 EPC: oral proceedings may take place at the insistence of the EPO, if it considers it expedient, or at the request of any party to the proceedings.
Useful links on hearings at the EPO
EPO
Coronavirus (COVID-19)—continually updated information
Examining divisions
Decision of the president of the EPO dated December 17, 2020, concerning oral proceedings by video conference before examining divisions
Opposition divisions
Information about access to oral proceedings by video conference before opposition divisions
Examining divisions and opposition divisions
Notice from the European Patent Office dated December 17, 2020, concerning the taking of evidence by video conference by examining and opposition divisions
Boards of Appeal
Oral proceedings before the Boards of Appeal—continuation of the measures adopted due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and revised practice on oral proceedings by VICO
Filing of documents
Decision of the president of the European Patent Office dated May 13, 2020, concerning the filing of documents during telephone consultations and during interviews and oral proceedings held by video conference
Taking of evidence
Instructions for witnesses giving evidence by video conference
Howard Read is a partner at Appleyard Lees. He can be contacted at: Howard.read@appleyardlees.com.
Today’s top stories
UK High Court to hear copyright suit over Bitcoin white paper
Appleyard Lees, EPO, oral proceedings, video conference, The Hague, Skype, Boards of Appeal, patent application, COVID-19