WIPR survey: Majority back USPTO over ‘disparaging’ trademark rulings
11-05-2015
US politician introduces bill to ban ‘redskin’ trademarks
09-02-2015
ROBERT MIRAMONTES/ SHUTTERSTOCK.COM
The Redskins and the Slants cases, which centre on whether potentially offensive words can be trademarked, are making their way through the US courts, with the First Amendment likely to play a part. WIPR reports.
Taken at face value, the terms ‘redskins’ and ‘slants’ are likely to cause offence.
One is a slang word to describe Native Americans, using skin colour as a defining characteristic. The other, making reference to the perceived shape of their eyes, is slang for people of Asian heritage.
But away from the obvious ability of those terms to cause hurt or offence two US courts are debating whether they should be granted trademark protection and enjoy the benefits it would bring.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, use the same link but select the 'trial' option in the dropdown box. NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@worldipreview.com
USPTO, Redskins, The Slants, McGinley, TTAB, First Amendment, US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
