1 June 2011Jurisdiction reportsCandy Chen and Crystal Chen

Relaxed guidelines for amendments after grant

The revision is in response to a series of court judgments rendered by the Intellectual Property Court (IP Court), which revoked TIPO’s decisions on not entering the patentees’ claim amendments after grant. According to Article 64 of the Patent Act, amendments to the contents of the specification and drawings after grant should be limited to narrowing the scope of claims, correction of the errors made in the specification, or explanation of obscure descriptions.

However, experiences from patentees indicate that amendments after grant have rarely been allowed and the TIPO has been overly strict in terms of allowing amendments after grant. This strict practice has put patentees in an unfavourable position when defending patent validity during litigation or invalidation proceedings, as unsuccessfully narrowing a claim may render the entire claim invalid.

The amended guidelines allow amendments after grant, but elaborate situations where TIPO may deem a broadening or alteration of the claimed scope include:

  1. Substituting technical features set forth in the original claim for terms with broader definition
  2. Reducing limitations in the original claim
  3. Adding subject matter to the original claim set
  4. Recapturing technical disclosure that has been deleted or renounced before grant
  5. Replacing technical features set forth in the original claim by terms with opposite definition
  6. Altering technical features set forth in the original claim to different meanings in substance
  7. Altering the subject matter of a claim
  8. Introducing technical features that are not specific technical features or elaborative technical features of the technical feature set forth in the original claim and
  9. The technical field or technical issue to be resolved by the claimed invention is different after amendment.

The most significant relaxation is how TIPO should treat limitations that are not set forth in the original claims but are described in the original description. Under the previous guidelines, other than species of a generic limitation, no other limitations were allowed by TIPO even if clearly described in the specification as elaborative limitations defining an element set forth in the original claims.

According to the amended guidelines, however, if incorporation of such limitations into the claims does not alter the technical issue intended to be solved by the original claimed invention, such incorporation shall not be deemed alteration of the scope of protection.

“According to Article 64 of the Patent Act, amendments to the contents of the specification and drawings after grant should be limited to narrowing the scope of claims, correction of the errors made in the specification, or explanation of obscure descriptions.”

For example, for an invention originally set forth to comprise elements ‘A, B, C, and D’ and intended to solve a technical issue ‘T,’ if it is described in the original description that ‘A’ is preferably ‘a,’ this is permitted to be incorporated into the claims under the previous guidelines, so as to reduce the claim scope to ‘a, B, C and D.’ On the contrary, if it is described in the original description that ‘A’ is constituted of ‘a1’ and ‘a2,’ then ‘a1’ and ‘a2’ will not be permitted to substitute element ‘A’ under the previous guidelines.

Following the same example however, under the proposed revisions, if ‘A’ is constituted of ‘a1’ and ‘a2,’ and the claim is amended to claim an invention comprising ‘a1, a2, B, C, and D,’ and the amended invention still serves to solve the technical issue ‘T,’ it will be allowed by the TIPO.

Following the revisions, it is worth noting that the claimed invention should still intend to solve the same technical issue after the amendments. Should amendments after grant alter or add technical issues to be solved, they are deemed alteration of patent scope in substance and the amendments will not be allowed. The idea of maintaining “the same technical issue to be solved” has not been emphasised before in the current examination guidelines for amendments after grant.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk