tomertu / Shutterstock.com
Amid growing concern about the low representation of women at the Patent Bar, the US Patent and Trademark Office is considering changes to its qualifications criteria. Critics say that this assessment is long overdue, as Muireann Bolger discovers.
When law student Mary Hannon published an academic article without fanfare in autumn 2020, she had little inkling of the ripples it would send throughout IP and beyond. Or that it would lead to a clamour for change at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) and provoke ongoing debate among patent practitioners.
The paper, “The Patent Bar Gender Gap: Expanding the Eligibility Requirements to Foster Inclusion and Innovation in the US Patent System”, argues that there are systemic barriers facing women at the US Patent Bar, and proposes solutions to dismantle them.
When it comes to the demographics of patent practitioners, details are scant because the USPTO does not collect or provide substantial demographic data. But Saurabh Vishnubhakat, professor at Texas A&M University, suggested in his 2014 study, “Gender Diversity in the Patent Bar”, that only 18% of patent practitioners were women.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at firstname.lastname@example.org
Gender diversity, Patent Bar, USPTO, D&I, innovation, neuroscience, biomechanical engineering, genetics, STEM, postgraduate, designs