• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Community & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
    • INTA 2026
  • In-house
  • Trademarks
  • Patents
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Global In-House Elite 2026
    • Influential Women in IP 2026
    • Leaders 2026
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • A case for aligning copyright and the videogame industry
shutterstock_1705733206_bondart-photography
2 November 2022FeaturesCopyrightGaetano Dimita, Yin Harn Lee, Michaela Macdonald

A case for aligning copyright and the videogame industry

Videogames have certain unique characteristics that set them apart from other types of creative works. They are born digital and their inherently interactive nature fosters user engagement and participation to a degree unprecedented in any other type of creative work.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Week Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@worldipreview.com




Editor's picks

UKIPO’s veto of Emotional Perception patent is ‘not good for the economy’
AI
UKIPO’s veto of Emotional Perception patent is ‘not good for the economy’
2 October 2026

Editor's picks

AI
UKIPO’s veto of Emotional Perception patent is ‘not good for the economy’
2 October 2026   Counsel for the tech startup hits back at the patent office’s “archaic thinking”, after the hearing officer insists his reasoning is aligned with the Supreme Court’s landmark artificial neural network decision.
Trademarks
Lidl and P&G counsel: Greenwashing claims underpriced as litigation risks rise
28 September 2026
Patents
Legal lender may scoop $1.4bn of $5.7bn patent verdict against Apple
28 September 2026
Patents
The data centre boom: What IP owners and implementers need to know
25 September 2026
In-House
American Airlines proves the sky is the limit for IP-backed loans
24 September 2026
In-House
Arm interview: The IP team helping to ship 900 computer chips a second
24 September 2026

More articles

INTA updates pricing after ‘listening’ to members’ concerns about costs
Why Thomson Reuters v Ross is no ‘ordinary copyright case’
Temu unveils new GI protection to support local producers and brand owners
Lego loses ‘fair use’ arguments in Queer Eye jacket copyright dispute
Thomson Reuters scores landmark AI copyright win in US appeals court
Clifford Chance recruits new head of Asia-Pac
Lidl and P&G counsel: Greenwashing claims underpriced as litigation risks rise
Marques: Why counsel 'need a seat' at the table in the age of AI, influencers and regulation

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin

Copyright © worldipreview.com 2024   |   Headless Content Management with Blaze