The Neurim ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union sheds light on the requirement of the ‘first marketing authorisation’ for supplementary protection certificates, says André Guder.
On July 19, 2012, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued its ruling in the Neurim case (C-130/11). This decision creates new opportunities for extending the period of effective protection of a product by supplementary protection certificates (SPCs).
In particular, it clarifies that an SPC can be granted for a new, patented medical use of a product for which a marketing authorisation has been obtained, even if an earlier marketing authorisation for a different use of the same product exists.
In the underlying case, Neurim had found that the compound melatonin, a natural hormone that was not patented as such, can be used for treating insomnia in human patients aged 55 or older. A European patent was granted to Neurim for its formulation Circadin. At the time Neurim obtained the authorisation to place Circadin on the market, less than five years of the patent term were left, and Neurim filed an SPC application.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, use the same link but select the 'trial' option in the dropdown box. NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at email@example.com
CJEU, Neurim, André Guder, SPCs, first marketing authorisation