EPO’s G1/19 decision has ‘far-reaching’ implications for AI: lawyers
Dafinchi / Shutterstock.com
The EPO has clarified the patentability of computer-implemented inventions—and it’s good news, explain Tim Watkin and Lara Sibley of Marks & Clerk.
On March 10, the European Patent Office’s (EPO) Enlarged Board of Appeal published its keenly-anticipated decision G 1/19 on computer-implemented simulations.
G 1/19 holds that the EPO’s existing approach for assessing the patentability of computer-implemented inventions (CIIs) should indeed be used to assess computer simulation inventions. According to this approach, whether a claim has inventive step is assessed using only any features of the claim which contribute to the claim’s “technical character”.
In contrast to a leading earlier case, G 1/19 holds that it is not decisive whether a technical or a non-technical system or process is simulated. Simulation of a technical system is not necessarily technical.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at email@example.com
EPO, inventions, Board of Appeal, technical system, Marks & Clerk, simulation, design, patents, inventive step