After much wait and speculation, the Indian Patent Office recently released the Manual of Patent Practice and Procedure.
After much wait and speculation, the Indian Patent Office recently released the Manual of Patent Practice and Procedure. There were expectations that the procedures in the manual would mirror contemporary developments, particularly those stemming from judicial pronouncements on patent procedural law.
While all hopes have not been met, the far-reaching decision of the High Court of Delhi in UCB Farchim SA v Cipla Ltd and Ors has been adopted. This decision concerns the maintainability of appeals before the Intellectual Property Appellate Board (IPAB) from orders passed by the controller of patents in pre-grant opposition proceedings.
One peculiar feature of Indian patent law is the provision for pre-grant oppositions. A pre-grant opposition can be filed by ‘any person’ as opposed to a post-grant opposition, which can only be filed by ‘any person interested (which includes a person engaged in, or promoting, research in the same field as that to which the invention relates)’.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at email@example.com
Pre-grant opposition, India, appeals, Manual of Patent Practice and Procedure