Subscribe
shutterstock_1218220324_everything_possible
26 May 2023FeaturesCopyrightMarisa Woutersen

AI ingestion of IP is fair use, says ex-USCO counsel

The processing of copyrighted work by artificial intelligence (AI) when training models should be considered fair use, according to a former general counsel of the  US Copyright Office (USCO).

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
Judge orders attorneys to declare non-use of AI
1 June 2023   Texas judge issues order requiring all briefs to have not been created using generative AI tools | Platforms such as ChatGPT ‘make stuff up’ and are ‘unbound by any sense of duty, honour, or justice’, he said | EU hints at AI code of conduct 'within weeks'.
Copyright
Reaction: UK scraps radical AI mining proposals
6 February 2023   Lawyers say the country is now behind the EU and Japan | Government may have pushed key AI questions to the courts | Finnegan | Marks & Clerk | Bird & Bird | Brown, Neri, Smith & Khan | Gowling WLG.
Copyright
Artistic licence?: Stability AI v Getty Images
26 January 2023   In the first of a two-part series on art and AI, Muireann Bolger explores a case that opens a Pandora's box of issues over the use of unlicensed creative works.


Editor's picks

Stability attacks Getty’s ‘confected’ case in closing arguments
Artificial Intelligence
Stability attacks Getty’s ‘confected’ case in closing arguments
3 July 2025

Editor's picks

Artificial Intelligence
Stability attacks Getty’s ‘confected’ case in closing arguments
3 July 2025   Stability attacked Getty’s claims, leaving the image publisher struggling to conclude the hearing on a high note. The AI company presented arguments on the relevance of foreign evidence to the UK case, the commercial use of watermarks, and offered rebuttals of consumer confusion and economic harm claims. Marisa Woutersen reports.
Trademarks
Ferrari wins Testarossa classic car case at EU court
2 July 2025
Patents
‘We created law’: G1/24 and the creation of the ‘diamond standard’
1 July 2025
Patents
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
20 June 2025
AI
What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?
20 June 2025
Future of IP
‘Sad beige’ lawsuit shows how hard it is for influencers to stand out
20 June 2025

More articles

Stability attacks Getty’s ‘confected’ case in closing arguments
‘Once is good enough’: Getty closing arguments rely on scant evidence
Lord Justice Birss to become chancellor of the High Court
Tech litigators join Hogan Lovells’ Paris practice from A&O Shearman
Getty v Stability AI: Five takeaways from the courtroom so far
Getty drops primary copyright claims against Stability AI
Defending the realm: How a key MoD supplier crafts its IP strategy
How IP firms can champion LGBTQ+ staff beyond Pride 2025

Copyright © worldipreview.com 2024   |   Headless Content Management with Blaze