istock-872163938filo
22 June 2018Patents

TPN Europe 2018: When social media upends patent applications

A patent attorney at chemicals and sustainable technologies company Johnson Matthey has told an industry conference how “social media is one of my pet hates”.

Angela King explained that while in a previous role at patent attorney firm Murgitroyd, the European Patent Office and the UK Intellectual Property Office cited social media against clients’ patent applications.

King was speaking at the Technology Patent Network (TPN) Europe conference in London yesterday, June 21.

In the first instance, a company called NB Jewellery applied to patent a clasp on the back of a jewellery item so that pendants on a necklace could be easily interchanged.

But the IPO raised an objection based on the applicant having released a picture of the jewellery on its Twitter feed before the date of the application. Further posts indicated that the jewellery had been donated to charity and was therefore available to the public.

After joking about her horror because “I had never used Twitter before”, King said the instance showed the inventor’s lack of understanding in releasing the picture publicly before the application had been filed. NB Jewellery later abandoned the application.

The second case involved a third-party video blog (vlog) by a “US influencer in the craft field” whose online tutorials were cited against a patent application, King explained.

The patent, filed by SC Johnson, related to a plastic moulded product into which melted wax would be poured before cooling, and the design “was such that solid wax would be easy to get out”.

Although the vlogger makes candle products, “we would never think to look at vlogs”, King said, adding that SC Johnson was forced to amend the claims so that they were much narrower in scope.

She said social media can be “really annoying” as “you would never think to look” at it as a source of prior art.

King added that the issue of social media disclosures from within a company can be hard to control, despite the IP training on offer, and asked her fellow panellists whether they had any tips on how to prevent information being unwittingly leaked outside the company.

Anna Maria Lagerqvist Gahm, senior IP counsel at Volvo Car Group, who had spoken earlier about IP and the internet of things, stressed that education is key.

Adam Pilcher, IP attorney at Vodafone Group Services, added that social media can actually provide a “great opportunity” to enable collaboration within a company, to “get the message out there” and promote IP triumphs.

He added that these efforts “can get engineers thinking about IP and reduce the tendency to undervalue their ideas or keep them to themselves”.

TPN Europe was hosted by World IP Review.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox.

Today's top stories

Director targets Disney’s ‘Inside Out’ in copyright suit

Apple pursues another avenue in Qualcomm clash

IMPI updates IP law to protect non-traditional TMs

TPN Europe 2018: ‘We practise what we invent’, says IBM

TPN Europe 2018: The highs and lows of blockchain IP

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
21 June 2018   Car manufacturers will need to become more familiar with protecting digital products with IP amid the emergence of “fast and vast” data generated from the internet of things, a Volvo Cars counsel has said.
Patents
21 June 2018   In the coming years “artificial intelligence will become pervasive and touch every aspect of our lives and we’ll wonder how we ever did without it”, explained Sonia Cooper, senior patent attorney of IP policy and strategy at Microsoft.