10-01-2020
David Smith / Shutterstock.com
The US Supreme Court is set to hear arguments next week in a key dispute that is likely to have ramifications for what remedies courts can apply for trademark infringement.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@worldipreview.com
Romag Fasteners, US Supreme Court, Fossil, profits, infringement, US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, Lucky Brand, Marcel Fashion Group, fashion
Romag v Fossil: a ‘pro-brand’ ruling, say lawyers
24-04-2020
SCOTUS grapples with ‘wilfulness’ in TM infringement
15-01-2020
‘Defence preclusion’ line falls flat at SCOTUS, say lawyers
14-01-2020
Willfulness should not be required for profits award: AIPLA
23-09-2019
SCOTUS to clarify rules on awarding TM profits; defence ‘preclusion’
01-07-2019
