15 January 2020TrademarksRory O'Neill

SCOTUS grapples with ‘wilfulness’ in TM infringement

US Supreme Court justices presiding over a closely-watched case are so far struggling with the notion of “wilfulness” as a requirement for awarding profits in trademark infringement cases.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Trademarks

Romag v Fossil: a ‘pro-brand’ ruling, say lawyers

24 April 2020 Yesterday’s US Supreme Court ruling in Romag v Fossil is the latest effort to erase categorical rules on remedies for IP infringement, lawyers have told WIPR.

Trademarks

SCOTUS preview: justices consider profits awards for TM infringement

10 January 2020 The US Supreme Court is set to hear arguments next week in a key dispute that is likely to have ramifications for what remedies courts can apply for trademark infringement.

Stability attacks Getty’s ‘confected’ case in closing arguments

‘Once is good enough’: Getty closing arguments rely on scant evidence

Lord Justice Birss to become chancellor of the High Court

Ferrari wins Testarossa classic car case at EU court

‘Here to stay’: UKIPO unveils ‘interesting’ SkyKick roadmap

Champagne makers raise glass to key EU ruling on PDOs

Tech litigators join Hogan Lovells’ Paris practice from A&O Shearman

Life after Iconix v Dream Pairs: Key lessons for brand owners

SCOTUS grapples with ‘wilfulness’ in TM infringement

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles