istock-458270551-peterfz30
25 May 2018Patents

Philips patent upheld in SEP clash with HTC

The English High Court has said a standard-essential patent (SEP) owned by Philips is valid and has been infringed by HTC and AsusTek Computer.

Mr Justice Arnold made the ruling on Wednesday, May 23, in the first of what could be four decisions in the case.

Philips has accused Taiwanese electronics companies HTC and AsusTek of infringing three European (UK) patents that it has declared essential to the European Telecommunications Standards Institute’s (ETSI) Universal Mobile Telecommunications System, a 3G standard.

The three patents—numbers 1 440 525; 1 685 659; and 1 623 511—cover the sections of the standard directed to the operation of the High Speed Packet Access (HSPA) system. HTC and AsusTek sell HSPA-compatible mobile phones.

Arnold explained that the technical issues relating to the patents will be tried in two separate trials, with this first one examining the validity and essentiality of the ‘525 patent.

The second trial will focus on the same issues surrounding the other two patents, while two further trials will be conducted—if necessary—to cover “further technical issues that have subsequently emerged” and “issues relating to Philips’ undertaking to ETSI to grant licences on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms”.

In this first trial, the defendants claimed that the ‘525 patent, which is called “Radio communications system” is obvious over two pieces of prior art. Arnold said it was common ground that it was necessary for him only to consider claim 10.

The judge said the patent was not obvious in light of either piece of prior art, and said the patent is valid and has been infringed.

In a typically long and detailed judgment by Arnold, the ruling stretched to 268 paragraphs, although the judge said the parties had filed a substantial volume of evidence despite the limited number and narrowness of the issues.

The judgment is the second on FRAND issued by the English High Court this week.

On Tuesday, the day before Arnold’s decision, Mr Justice Morgan ruled in a case between Apple and Qualcomm, issuing a mixed finding for the defendant Qualcomm and allowing most of the issues in the case to proceed to trial.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox.

Today's top stories

Samsung told to pay Apple $539m for patent infringement

Tinder’s parent company hit with patent claim

IP Australia introduces machine learning for TM examiners

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
12 July 2018   The English High Court has held that a standard-essential patent owned by technology company Philips is invalid, two months after it upheld the validity of another related SEP in the same dispute.
Patents
20 July 2018   The English High Court yesterday upheld the validity of a standard-essential patent owned by Philips in the technology company’s ongoing dispute with Taiwanese firms HTC and AsusTek,
article
11 September 2020   A former vice president of Philips North America must face allegations that he purloined confidential information in order to gain customers after he began to work for GE Healthcare, according to a Maryland federal court.