Luxottica and Oakley eye up counterfeiters in TM suit
Italian eyewear company Luxottica, and its subsidiary Oakley, have filed a trademark infringement lawsuit against a number of online counterfeiters.
Luxottica and Oakley filed the lawsuit (pdf) at the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, on November 18.
The suit claimed that a group of unknown counterfeiters, who reside in China, sold counterfeit versions of Ray-Ban and Oakley eyewear online.
Luxottica owns brands including Ray-Ban, Oakley, Vogue Eyewear, Persol, Oliver Peoples, Alain Mikli and Arnett.
The eyewear company argued that the defendants infringed the trademarks to recreate counterfeit imitations of their products and falsely designated their origin.
The defendants also engaged in acts which violated the Illinois Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act, claimed Luxottica.
According to the suit, Luxottica owns trademarks at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) for the term ‘Ray-Ban’, which it has used since 1937.
Oakley owns marks for the term ‘Oakley’, ‘Crosslink’ and ‘Jawbreaker’.
The suit said that an “interrelated group of counterfeiters” worked together to “knowingly and wilfully manufacture, import, distribute, offer for sale, and sell products” that bore counterfeit versions of the eyewear brands’ marks.
These counterfeiters sold the fake sunglasses on a number of e-commerce platforms.
Internet sites such as the ones run by the defendants “are estimated to receive tens of millions of visits per year and to generate over $135 billion in annual online sales”, the suit said, according to intellectual property statistics issued by US Homeland Security.
The suit added that these online stores include “content and design elements” that make it “very difficult” for consumers to distinguish counterfeit sites from an authorised website.
Defendants also go to “great lengths to conceal their identities” and often use multiple fictitious names and addresses to register and operate their “massive network” of internet stores, said the claim.
Luxottica and Oakley are asking for statutory damages for wilful trademark infringement of $2 million for each use of the marks and $100,000 per domain name incorporating any of their marks.
The companies are also seeking injunctive relief, transfer of the infringing domain names, an account of profits, costs and attorney’s fees.
The defendants were named in an appendix, but the document is sealed.
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk