22 June 2021PatentsMuireann Bolger

Arthrex: ‘patents have become more political’

In a decision highly anticipated by patent owners, the US Supreme Court has delivered its final ruling in US v Arthrex—a fractured opinion that lawyers say leaves burning questions around its political implications.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

Arthrex: more unanswered questions

17 November 2021 The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit’s decision in Mobility v Unified Patents leaves Arthrex-related questions, as Scott Hejny of McKool Smith explains.

Patents

The PTAB’s post-Arthrex future

23 July 2021 Despite the latest challenge to its legitimacy, the US Patent Trial and Appeal Board has survived—and survive it must, say David McCombs, Joe Matal, and Eugene Goryunov of Haynes and Boone.

Patents

BREAKING: SCOTUS says IPRs should be reviewable in Arthrex; hands more power to USPTO director

21 June 2021 The US Supreme Court has confirmed that judges for the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) act as unconstitutional principal officers, and should therefore have been appointed by the President, in its final ruling in United States v Arthrex.

UK-India trade deal is ‘missed opportunity’, say industry bodies

SEPs now searchable on WIPO’s global patent database

INTA 2025: San Diego to host largest post-COVID Annual Meeting

'Nothing can stand in the way of our work': Ukraine resumes IP system

Foley adds five-partner team from Perkins Coie and K&L Gates

WATCH: Finding a new balance in IP protection with trade secret protection

Optis v Apple: How the court calculated the royalty rate

Cahill expands practice with three-partner team from King & Spalding

Arthrex: ‘patents have become more political’

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles