- Rankings
- WIPR Insights
Jurisdiction Reports
Refine Search
Jurisdiction reports
Domain names in Denmark are regulated by the Act on Internet Domains Specifically Allocated to Denmark (also called Danish Domain Law) and the general terms of business of DK-Hostmaster A/S. 1 June 2010
Jurisdiction reports
Almost 19 years ago, a new concept for providing a so-called ‘pipeline protection’ was incorporated in the new Law of Industrial Property, in force as of June 28, 1991. 1 June 2010
Jurisdiction reports
On April 7, 2010, the Dutch Court of The Hague gave a provisional judgment in the patent case between Mundipharma and Sandoz. 1 June 2010
Jurisdiction reports
The recent implementation of new measures in connection with intellectual property administrative procedures in Peru has brought excellent benefits for the trademark community. 1 June 2010
Jurisdiction reports
A recent decision of Germany’s Federal Supreme Court in Fischdosendeckel (Fish Tin Cap) concerns the somewhat strange case of negative statements about a competitor’s products in the specification of a patent. 1 June 2010
Jurisdiction reports
Individuals and small companies who own US patents encounter hurdles when faced with suing infringers, including the significant legal costs associated with representation. 1 April 2010
Jurisdiction reports
Although Turkey has followed international developments and harmonised its Trademark Law with EU legislation, the registration of non-traditional marks such as product packaging and product shape has not fallen into place. 1 April 2010
Jurisdiction reports
The new Implementing Regulations of the Chinese Patent Law became effective on February 1, 2010, together with the new Guidelines for Examination. 1 April 2010
Jurisdiction reports
On December 1, 2009, the Supreme Court of Denmark, as the second instance body, ruled in a case settling a dispute over the copyright to a computer program. 1 April 2010
Jurisdiction reports
A new decision by Germany’s Federal Supreme Court sheds further light on what measures may be taken to protect the confidentiality interests of parties affected by court orders authorising the inspection of devices on their business premises. 1 April 2010
Not finding what you're looking for, please try resetting your applied search and filters,
or try the full site search.