• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
  • In-house
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • ‘World of Warcraft’ makers take aim at 'ripoff' distributors
shutterstock_761248267_casimiro_pt
21 August 2019CopyrightTom Phillips

‘World of Warcraft’ makers take aim at 'ripoff' distributors

  • Video game publisher Blizzard Entertainment has taken legal action against the developers of a game which it says rips off its flagship “Warcraft” series.

In the lawsuit, filed last Friday, August 16 at the US District Court for the Central District of California, Blizzard alleged that defendants including Hong Kong company Sina Games stole extensively from its “Warcraft” series for the “Glorious Saga” online game.

According to Blizzard, the game features characters, names, and likenesses bearing a striking resemblance to those in its “Warcraft” franchise, including the hugely successful “World of Warcraft”.

“Glorious Saga” is a free-to-play game available online. According to Blizzard, the defendants earn revenue from the game through the sale of virtual in-game currency.

This model, Blizzard argued, “ relies on attracting a large body of users to download their games”.

As such, the defendants “made a concerted decision to trade off Blizzard’s IP and to use it to entice potential customers to play the game,” the suit alleged.

Blizzard also accused the defendants of deleting social media comments from users calling out the games “direct ripoff” of “Warcraft”.

“Defendants know exactly what they are they doing, and they specifically know that their conduct is unlawful and infringes Blizzard’s IP rights,” the suit said.

According to Blizzard, “Glorious Saga” is distributed a cluster of shell companies based in Hong Kong and the British Virgin Islands.

Two individuals supposedly behind the shell companies were also named as defendants in the complaint.

“World of Warcraft” is often listed as one of the most commercially successful video game franchises. Originally released in 2004, it was a landmark title in the field of ‘massively multiplayer online role-playing games’.

This story was first published on TBO.

Did you enjoy reading this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk




Editor's picks

What counts as an ‘infringing copy’? Getty takes AI fight to appeals court
AI
What counts as an ‘infringing copy’? Getty takes AI fight to appeals court
22 December 2025

Editor's picks

AI
What counts as an ‘infringing copy’? Getty takes AI fight to appeals court
22 December 2025
Trademarks
X strikes back against Twitter.new
17 December 2025
Trade secrets
Aon sues new US rival for ‘poaching employees and taking boxloads of secrets’
17 December 2025
Trademarks
Rings of power: Oura counsel on protecting an $11bn brand
15 December 2025
Trademarks
Five firms reach highest tier in WIPR’s USA Trademarks Rankings
12 December 2025
Patents
5 ways director Squires is changing US innovation
10 December 2025

More articles

Three in-house counsel perspectives on 2025–2026: Part 2
Three in-house counsel perspectives on 2025–2026: Part 1
What counts as an ‘infringing copy’? Getty takes AI fight to appeals court
Streaming setback: Nokia loses bid to shut down UK SEP dispute
Hogan Lovells and Cadwalader strike historic deal to create $3.6bn firm
Quantum innovation accelerating but funding gaps stall commercial shift
X strikes back against Twitter.new
Aon sues new US rival for ‘poaching employees and taking boxloads of secrets’

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin