• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • WIPO announces front runners for innovation
1 July 2013Copyright

WIPO announces front runners for innovation

Switzerland has retained its place as the world’s leading innovators while the US and UK are among the top five, figures released by the World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO) show.

The Global Innovation Index (GII), which recognises the importance of innovation in driving prosperity, has today announced the front runners in a list of 142 countries.

Switzerland tops the list for the second year in a row with a top five that also features Sweden and the Netherlands.

The GII, which has been co-published by WIPO, Cornell University and business school INSEAD has, since its launch in 2007, become a benchmarking tool for businesses and politicians seeking insight into the state of innovation.

According to WIPO director general Francis Gurry, the figures show that it retains a strong global presence despite the economic downturn.

He said: “Dynamic innovation hubs are multiplying around the world despite the difficult state of the global economy. These hubs leverage local advantages with a global outlook on markets and talent.

“For national-level policy makers seeking to support innovation, realising the full potential of innovation in their own backyards is often a more promising approach than trying to emulate successful innovation models elsewhere.”

A total of 84 indicators were used to compile the list including the quality of top universities and availability of microfinance and venture capital deals.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
The View from the Top
20 November 2020   Intellectual property offices around the world started out as registries to regulate a particular country’s IP regime. Innovation and technology are changing that. Tom Phillips reports.
Patents
Back to basics: renewing the foundations of innovation
1 December 2010   The economic crisis has caused companies and governments alike to reassess their spending. Jim Greenwood explains why imperilling IP protection for the biotechnology industry would be the worst possible outcome.


Editor's picks

A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
Patents
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
20 June 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
20 June 2025
Future of IP
‘Sad beige’ lawsuit shows how hard it is for influencers to stand out
20 June 2025
Trademarks
Creative licence: Inside the LEGO Group’s Asia playbook
16 June 2025
Copyright
‘Cynical and bewildering’: UK omits copyright protections in Data Bill
13 June 2025
Patents
Vidal: Stewart’s ruling steers IPR process ‘dangerously off course’
11 June 2025
AI
Getty slams Stability’s ‘distorted AI rubbish’ in opening arguments
10 June 2025

More articles

A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?
Vidal: Settled expectations factor is ‘unconstitutional overreach’
‘Sad beige’ lawsuit shows how hard it is for influencers to stand out
Stamped out: What was in the US Copyright Office AI report?
Third Circ grants first ‘fair use’ AI and copyright appeal in Thomson v ROSS
Getty bid to broaden claim shut down by Court of Appeal
How to cook a frog: The erosion of exclusive copyright in the EU

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin