• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • US Court to decide if DCMA provision violates First Amendment
shutterstock_1126055060_zimmytws
2 July 2019Copyright

US Court to decide if DCMA provision violates First Amendment

A US court is to decide whether the “anti-circumvention” provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ( DMCA) violates the First Amendment.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
Safe harbour system ‘unbalanced’, says US Copyright Office
22 May 2020   The US Copyright Office has concluded that the safe harbour provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act is “out of sync” with Congress’ intent.
Copyright
EFF warns of ‘ill-considered’ copyright provisions
24 October 2018   Articles 11 and 13 of the recently-passed copyright directive are “ill-considered and should not be EU law”, according to a letter shared by the Electronic Frontier Foundation yesterday.


Editor's picks

WIPR’s China Trademarks Rankings 2025: New entries, hidden gems and big brands
Trademarks
WIPR’s China Trademarks Rankings 2025: New entries, hidden gems and big brands
20 October 2025

Editor's picks

Trademarks
WIPR’s China Trademarks Rankings 2025: New entries, hidden gems and big brands
20 October 2025
AI
Moderna counsel: 'AI can end the billable hour’
16 October 2025
Trademarks
Iceland aims to thaw colour judgment on appeal
14 October 2025
AI
Microsoft counsel: Knowing your value is the real edge in an AI world
13 October 2025
Copyright
Paddington Bear’s ‘challenging’ action over drug-addled parody
10 October 2025
Patents
Bridging Brunel and AI: Why CIPA sees ‘a golden opportunity’
9 October 2025

More articles

Reddit targets ‘would-be bank robbers’ Perplexity AI and others
Veteran patent attorney leaves WBD to ‘supercharge advocacy’ at new firm
Second bite at the cherry: Adjudicating redesigns after an ITC exclusion order
End of the ‘Death Squad’? Squires puts PTAB on trial
Cole Schotz brings in experienced litigator in Dallas
‘All it takes is a post on Truth Social’: Is this patent reform's moment?
Vidal supports IPR petition for first time against ‘settled expectations’
Weil continues expansion with top trade secrets litigator

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin