• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Trade Secrets Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • US Court to decide if DCMA provision violates First Amendment
shutterstock_1126055060_zimmytws
2 July 2019Copyright

US Court to decide if DCMA provision violates First Amendment

A US court is to decide whether the “anti-circumvention” provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act ( DMCA) violates the First Amendment.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
Safe harbour system ‘unbalanced’, says US Copyright Office
22 May 2020   The US Copyright Office has concluded that the safe harbour provision of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act is “out of sync” with Congress’ intent.
Copyright
EFF warns of ‘ill-considered’ copyright provisions
24 October 2018   Articles 11 and 13 of the recently-passed copyright directive are “ill-considered and should not be EU law”, according to a letter shared by the Electronic Frontier Foundation yesterday.


Editor's picks

Morgan Lewis gains momentum with three more US partner hires
Careers
Morgan Lewis gains momentum with three more US partner hires
10 September 2025

Editor's picks

Careers
Morgan Lewis gains momentum with three more US partner hires
10 September 2025
Careers
EXCLUSIVE: The SEP ‘trailblazers’ leading Fish’s specialist practice
8 September 2025
Designs
UK designers welcome IP reforms for $100bn+ industry
5 September 2025
Patents
Smart ringleader: Could Ōura’s market dominance be under threat?
4 September 2025
Patents
Why Masimo’s ‘rare’ move pushes Apple case into uncharted territory
3 September 2025
Trade secrets
Four firms reach highest tier in WIPR’s 2025 Global Trade Secrets Rankings
18 August 2025

More articles

Hollywood studios join forces to sue Chinese AI startup’s content generator
For F***’s sake: Why everyone needs clarity over F-word trademark refusal
Google scores win in copyright battle but faces fresh suit
WilmerHale hires litigation and tech expert in California
Trade secrets go global: How brand owners face a high-stakes battlefront
AI and the illusion of accuracy: 3 things lawyers need to know
Finnegan’s new AI practice is a project in ‘interdisciplinary’ expertise
Silicon Valley tech transfer partner joins Baker McKenzie

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin