• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • INTA 2024
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2024
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Original and creative designs can be copyrighted: AG
shutterstock_1010946472_nitpicker
3 May 2019Copyright

Original and creative designs can be copyrighted: AG

Original designs can be granted copyright protection, according to an advocate general (AG) of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
‘Originality’ the only requirement for design copyright: CJEU
12 September 2019   The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled today, September 12 that originality is the only criterion required for a design to be protectable by copyright.
Trademarks
TM disclaimer has no bearing on confusion assessment: AG
6 March 2019   The existence of a disclaimer relating to an element of an earlier trademark shouldn’t have any bearing on the assessment of the likelihood of confusion between that mark and an applied-for trademark.


Editor's picks

Apple must pay Optis $700m-the biggest patent award in UK history
Patents
Apple must pay Optis $700m-the biggest patent award in UK history
2 May 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
Apple must pay Optis $700m-the biggest patent award in UK history
2 May 2025
Trademarks
Thatchers, Skykick and dupes: What’s on a fashion IP influencer’s radar?
30 April 2025
Patents
Why US patent reform is ‘essential’ for US economic prosperity and security
28 April 2025
Patents
G1/23 ruling: Why a pending EPO decision threatens decade-old products
28 April 2025
Diversity
WIPR Diversity & Inclusion reveals Top 100 People in IP for 2025
23 April 2025
Trademarks
Resilience and the power of brands: Elisabeth Stewart Bradley on 9/11, inclusion and the INTA presidency
22 April 2025

More articles

UK-India trade deal is ‘missed opportunity’, say industry bodies
'Nothing can stand in the way of our work': Ukraine resumes IP system
US-China tariffs: What hope is there for IP rightsholders?
Thatchers, Skykick and dupes: What’s on a fashion IP influencer’s radar?
IP and the commercialisation of genomic tech in Nigeria
Lululemon counsel on why Nike's 'Flyknit' claim construction faltered
World IP Day: Can copyright stay in tune with AI-generated music?
Lenovo’s legal leader: We should be ‘enablers, not blockers’

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin