• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Trade Secrets Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Original and creative designs can be copyrighted: AG
shutterstock_1010946472_nitpicker
3 May 2019Copyright

Original and creative designs can be copyrighted: AG

Original designs can be granted copyright protection, according to an advocate general (AG) of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
‘Originality’ the only requirement for design copyright: CJEU
12 September 2019   The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled today, September 12 that originality is the only criterion required for a design to be protectable by copyright.
Trademarks
TM disclaimer has no bearing on confusion assessment: AG
6 March 2019   The existence of a disclaimer relating to an element of an earlier trademark shouldn’t have any bearing on the assessment of the likelihood of confusion between that mark and an applied-for trademark.


Editor's picks

Morgan Lewis gains momentum with three more US partner hires
Careers
Morgan Lewis gains momentum with three more US partner hires
10 September 2025

Editor's picks

Careers
Morgan Lewis gains momentum with three more US partner hires
10 September 2025
Careers
EXCLUSIVE: The SEP ‘trailblazers’ leading Fish’s specialist practice
8 September 2025
Designs
UK designers welcome IP reforms for $100bn+ industry
5 September 2025
Patents
Smart ringleader: Could Ōura’s market dominance be under threat?
4 September 2025
Patents
Why Masimo’s ‘rare’ move pushes Apple case into uncharted territory
3 September 2025
Trade secrets
Four firms reach highest tier in WIPR’s 2025 Global Trade Secrets Rankings
18 August 2025

More articles

Hollywood studios join forces to sue Chinese AI startup’s content generator
Google scores win in copyright battle but faces fresh suit
WilmerHale hires litigation and tech expert in California
Finnegan’s new AI practice is a project in ‘interdisciplinary’ expertise
Authors’ class action complaint marks 50th US AI copyright suit
Anthropic signs historic $1.5bn copyright settlement
CJEU clarifies rule on partners representing their own firms
The rise of pro-NPE and patent sentiment in the US

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin