• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Original and creative designs can be copyrighted: AG
shutterstock_1010946472_nitpicker
3 May 2019Copyright

Original and creative designs can be copyrighted: AG

Original designs can be granted copyright protection, according to an advocate general (AG) of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU).

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
‘Originality’ the only requirement for design copyright: CJEU
12 September 2019   The Court of Justice of the European Union has ruled today, September 12 that originality is the only criterion required for a design to be protectable by copyright.
Trademarks
TM disclaimer has no bearing on confusion assessment: AG
6 March 2019   The existence of a disclaimer relating to an element of an earlier trademark shouldn’t have any bearing on the assessment of the likelihood of confusion between that mark and an applied-for trademark.


Editor's picks

Squires: ‘Inherited patent backlog was an absolute dumpster fire’
Patents
Squires: ‘Inherited patent backlog was an absolute dumpster fire’
1 November 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
Squires: ‘Inherited patent backlog was an absolute dumpster fire’
1 November 2025
Trademarks
AI fighting AI: Groq and Oura weigh in on the new brand battle
31 October 2025
Trademarks
‘We're being attacked from all sides’: Thermo Fisher Scientific counsel
30 October 2025
Patents
USPTO flags ‘foreign state-backed actors’ threat in stricter disclosure shift
29 October 2025
AI
WATCH: Untangling liability in AI systems—who’s responsible when things go wrong?
29 October 2025
Patents
Guarding innovation: How the Ministry of Defence keeps military inventions under wraps
27 October 2025

More articles

AI industry exceptions could muddy IP protection, says House counsel
Delegates descend upon Washington, DC for AIPLA Annual Meeting
Reddit targets ‘would-be bank robbers’ Perplexity AI and others
Paddington Bear’s ‘challenging’ action over drug-addled parody
Pyrrhic victory: Retailer lands partial legal victory over Shein—and a big bill
OpenAI ‘likely’ liable for infringement of German song lyrics
Court backs Anthropic’s record $1.5bn copyright deal
Gateley on growth trajectory with acquisition of trademark firm

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin