• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Copyright
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Events Videos
    • Law firm news
    • Trade secrets
  • In-house
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Jurisdictions
    • Europe
    • Americas
    • Asia
    • Australasia
    • Africa
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • Practice Area Rankings
    • Global In-House Elite 2026
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • IP services: Product walk-throughs
    • Whitepapers
    • Webinars
  • Events
    • Events schedule
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Request Trial
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • Japan considers copyright law extension
12 July 2013Copyright

Japan considers copyright law extension

The Japanese government is considering making changes to its copyright law which could see authors of protected works retain rights for an extra 20 years.

Current law provides protection for an author’s life plus 50 years after its death, but proposals have been made to extend the period to 70 years.

If implemented, the changes would protect songwriters, composers and music publishers, and would bring Japan’s copyright law in line with legislation in the US and EU.

The proposals stem from Japan’s desire to join the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), a free trade agreement between countries in the pacific region currently under negotiation and being spearheaded by the US.

According to Kensaku Takase, partner at the Tokyo office of Baker & McKenzie LLP, the US is understood to have been pressuring participating countries to strengthen their IP laws.

The Japanese Society for Rights of Authors, Composers and Publishers are among the groups that have been lobbying for an extension to copyright laws but, according to Yasufumi Shiroyama, partner at Anderson Mori & Tomotsune, the proposed changes are due to a desire to join the TPP and not pressure from lobbyists.

Expressing concern at the TPP model, Takase said: “It [TPP] is not a copyright treaty – it is a trade treaty with its main focus being agricultural trade. As such, the fact that copyright aspects have been introduced to negotiations is seen by some as being a way of implementing preferences which would benefit one country’s copyright industries over another.

“The danger for a US copyright holder [under current Japanese laws] would be that their copyright in one country would have expired earlier than other countries.”

Despite admitting that the proposals would improve trade, Takase conceded that they are “only a fraction” of the changes needed across Japan’s IP law to make it consistent with the US and EU.

“Japanese laws, especially in the IP arena, are unique. The more aligned Japan can get its laws with the US and EU, the much easier it will be for IP to be traded,” he said.

“There will still remain a significant number of differences. There is isolated focus on copyright and no focus on other areas of IP law which logically should also be addressed, such as trademark law.”

Countries participating in current TPP negotiations include: Australia, Brunei, Chile, Canada, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Peru, Singapore, the US and Vietnam.

After a final decision is taken by Japan, changes could be implemented within a year.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk




Editor's picks

The battle for Frida: Art, activism, and assets clash in trademark case
Trademarks
The battle for Frida: Art, activism, and assets clash in trademark case
24 April 2026

Editor's picks

Trademarks
The battle for Frida: Art, activism, and assets clash in trademark case
24 April 2026
Patents
A quantum leap? UK’s ‘commercialisation skills centre’ plays key role in tech ambition
20 April 2026
Patents
IP theft a major concern for automotive companies, US report shows
14 April 2026
Future of IP
IP finance gap risks startup exodus, EUIPO warns
13 April 2026
Trademarks
Yuga Labs wraps up ‘Bored Ape’ NFT row
13 April 2026
Trademarks
Judge questions X’s use of ‘Twitter’ in TM fight with Operation Bluebird
10 April 2026

More articles

Litigator from Brown Rudnick moves firms to chair practice
INTA 2026: In-house tips on what to do in London
Greenspoon Marder expands LA office with 10 new hires
In-house view: ‘External counsel must have commercial judgement'
IP theft a major concern for automotive companies, US report shows
IP finance gap risks startup exodus, EUIPO warns
Squire Patton Boggs names new European managing partner
Cox v Sony: SCOTUS trims ISP liability in ‘seismic decision’

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin