• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • India focus: Untangling the tax laws
solomon
30 September 2015CopyrightMahua Roy Chowdhury

India focus: Untangling the tax laws

As one of the most rapidly developing fields in India, intellectual property rights have attracted their fair share of complexities. IP is not explicitly defined in India’s Income Tax Act 1961 but has instead been indicated as “block assets”. Block assets comprise tangible and intangible assets wherein the intangible assets include patents, copyrighted works, trademarks, licences, franchises or any other business or commercial rights of a similar nature.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
Prosecuting software infringement in India
1 May 2015   The capability of Indian courts to interpret and analyse software infringement has yet to catch up with the rapid pace of technology, but positive signs in the US and UK should help practitioners in India and elsewhere. Mahua Roy Chowdhury of Solomon & Roy reports.


Editor's picks

‘Written submissions cannot be underestimated’: How G1/23 changed European prior art rules
Patents
‘Written submissions cannot be underestimated’: How G1/23 changed European prior art rules
18 July 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
‘Written submissions cannot be underestimated’: How G1/23 changed European prior art rules
18 July 2025
Trademarks
Iceland Foods TM frozen out of EU by Nordic country
16 July 2025
Patents
UK launches SEPs consultation in bid to tackle inefficiency
15 July 2025
Patents
Netlist’s IP head: External counsel ‘should understand our business goals’
11 July 2025
Trademarks
Rubik's Cube loses pivotal EU 'shape' case
9 July 2025
Artificial Intelligence
Stability attacks Getty’s ‘confected’ case in closing arguments
3 July 2025

More articles

Pressure mounts for Anthropic as judge allows authors to include pirated datasets in claims
Starjacking and reverse engineering: How AI is changing IP crime
Iceland Foods TM frozen out of EU by Nordic country
Why Rubik’s Cube was denied TM protection (again)
China’s Labubu toys: ‘Count the teeth’ to find fakes
EU takes fight to genAI in tough week for Big Tech
Kilpatrick adds ‘seasoned, versatile litigator’ as trademark partner
AI and IP USA 2025: Future-proofing event aims at intersection of technology and law

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin