• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Trade Secrets Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • EU law doesn’t prevent punitive damages in IP suits, says CJEU
atstock-productions-shutterstock-inc-damages-
26 January 2017Copyright

EU law doesn’t prevent punitive damages in IP suits, says CJEU

EU law does not prevent punitive damages from being awarded in intellectual property disputes, according to Europe’s highest court.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Trademarks
Typical punitive damages in IP cases
22 October 2021   China’s official case studies offer IP owners a guide to getting results against infringers, say Haiyu Li and Haoyu Feng of Chofn IP.
Copyright
TriZetto's $570M punitive damages win ruled ‘excessive’
21 April 2021   Tech company Syntel was hit with “excessive punitive damages” when a New York jury delivered a $855 million verdict in favour of TriZetto, a US judge has found.
Trademarks
WIPR Leaders 2020: Serbia practice update
5 February 2020   Mina Jovanovic of Zivko Mijatovic & Partners explains why, despite best intentions, a law enforcing punitive damages claims is not fit for purpose.


Editor's picks

Disney alleges 'conspiracy' plot in blockbuster streaming tech lawsuit
Patents
Disney alleges 'conspiracy' plot in blockbuster streaming tech lawsuit
13 August 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
Disney alleges 'conspiracy' plot in blockbuster streaming tech lawsuit
13 August 2025
Patents
Why Trump’s revenue-raising patent plan is rife with problems
12 August 2025
Patents
In focus: EPO's landmark G1/25 referral and what it could mean
5 August 2025
Trademarks
The $53m cutback to $1: Lessons from MGA Entertainment v OMG Girlz
4 August 2025
Trade secrets
Propel Fuels nets $883m in trade secrets dispute
1 August 2025
Patents
SAP, Google, Goodyear: Hot summer cases at the Federal Circuit
23 July 2025

More articles

Dr Martens stomps on challenge to vital mark
German ‘supercomputer’ firm files extra claims against NVIDIA at UPC
Hollywood studio issues AI ‘hands off’ warning in film credits
The $53m cutback to $1: Lessons from MGA Entertainment v OMG Girlz
Propel Fuels nets $883m in trade secrets dispute
FRAND in the UK part 2: Interim licences and other jurisdictions
Blank cheque for Big Tech: Trump’s AI plan leaves creators in the cold
Emotional Perception: Supreme Court chases the ghost in the ‘machine’

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin