Disrupting bias: why specific prejudices require a tailored intervention
English Court of Appeals cancels RAND trial in TQ Delta patent dispute
I Wei Huang / Shutterstock.com
The English Court of Appeal has avoided a potentially dangerous erosion of the without prejudice rule. Richard Roberts, Aidan Southall, and Georgia Carr of Potter Clarkson report.
In its decision of January 11, 2021, the English Court of Appeal set aside a freezing injunction imposed by the High Court in the context of an ongoing trade secrets dispute in the US. Key to its ruling was an analysis of the “unambiguous impropriety” exception to without prejudice (WP) privilege.
Emphasising the limited scope of that exception, this judgment preserves the privilege in WP communications, emphasising the strong public interest in facilitating open and frank settlement discussions between litigants, with an aim to resolving disputes.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at email@example.com
Potter Clarkson, English Court of Appeal, injunction, trade secrets, prejudice rule, telecommunications, Hytera, Motorola, High Court