LG sues TCL in Germany over LTE patents
Michael Vi / Shutterstock.com
In a significant 35 USC §101 ruling, the Federal Circuit has held that claims relating to an Ericsson patent were ineligible subject matter under the law, as Jeffrey D Smyth, Max Mauldin and Joseph Myles of Finnegan explain.
Ericsson v TCL Communication Technology Holdings began in 2015 when Ericsson filed suit alleging infringement of five patents against TCL (Case No. 18-2003, 2020 WL 1856498 [Fed Cir, Apr 14, 2020]). TCL successfully challenged four of the patents through inter partes review.
The fifth patent, US Patent No. 7,149,510, stayed in the suit. Before the district court, TCL moved for summary judgment of invalidity against the ’510 patent under 35 USC §101, asserting that its claims are patent-ineligible.
The court disagreed, holding that the claims are directed to eligible subject matter and recite an inventive concept. At trial, Ericsson asserted only claims 1 and 5 of the ’510 patent. The jury found that TCL had wilfully infringed the two claims and awarded damages, and the district court entered judgment against TCL.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at firstname.lastname@example.org
patent, Ericsson, ineligibility, Federal, Circuit, Finnegan, FRAND, subject, matter