shutterstock_1524431084_Ron Adar
The alleged theft of actor Seth Green’s “bored ape” non-fungible token has highlighted some unsettled IP issues, says Mauricio Uribe of Knobbe Martens.
Headlines such as “Actor Seth Green to pay $260,000 in ransom to retrieve rights to develop a television show based on the character in a stolen NFT!” have drawn recent attention to non-fungible tokens (NFTs).
Embodying copyrightable works as NFTs presents unique risks. However, a generalisation of the alleged facts related to Seth Green’s stolen NFT offers some insight into the current state of NFTs and some unique, unsettled IP issues.
At a high level, all NFTs are implemented on blockchain technology that provides for data immutability using distributed, non-centralised storage. NFTs are unlike a lot of other technologies in that the information that makes up the NFT (eg, the information that is maintained on the blockchain) can vary greatly. Accordingly, it can be confusing to think of NFTs as a standard technology having common IP issues.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@worldipreview.com
Knobbe Martens, Non-fungible Tokens, Copyright, Technology, Blockchain, Mauricio Uribe, North America
