Training generative AI: separating fact from fiction
01-09-2023
How to handle the ‘wild west’ of generative AI: part 2
18-08-2023
Generative AI tools: An agent of bias?
08-08-2023
Adobe offers ‘IP safe’ generative AI tool to businesses
12-06-2023
Deemerwha studio / Shutterstock.com
Recent court cases are beginning to hint at how copyright issues concerning the training of generative AI algorithms will be handled—but firmer guidance is needed to reassure artists, say Matt Savare, Bryan Sterba and Chloe Rippe of Lowenstein Sandler, in part I of a two-part series.
As generative artificial intelligence (GAI) pervades the public zeitgeist, calls for clarity in the US intellectual property regime have intensified.
On July 12, 2023, the Senate Subcommittee on Intellectual Property convened a hearing to address the major copyright implications of GAI technology. Participants ranged from artists to GAI leaders and policy experts, and all shared a (purported) concern for the preservation of artists’ legal rights amid the explosion of GAI capabilities.
In particular, the parties expressed a need for:
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@worldipreview.com
artificial intelligence, AI, generative AI, copyright
