18 August 2023FeaturesCopyrightMatt Savare and Bryan Sterba

How to handle the ‘wild west’ of generative AI: part 2

Courts have yet to articulate how copyright authorship standards should adapt to partially generated artificial intelligence (GAI) works. Yet, that has not stopped technologists from testing the legal boundaries.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

How to handle the ‘wild west’ of generative AI: part I

17 August 2023 Recent court cases are beginning to hint at how copyright issues concerning the training of generative AI algorithms will be handled—but firmer guidance is needed to reassure artists, say Matt Savare, Bryan Sterba and Chloe Rippe of Lowenstein Sandler, in part I of a two-part series.

Adobe offers ‘IP safe’ generative AI tool to businesses

12 June 2023 Firefly is a ‘commercially and legally safe’ tool that automatically attaches credentials tag that flags AI use | Software firm promises to protect customers from infringement claims.

Getty v Stability AI: Five takeaways from the courtroom so far

Getty drops primary copyright claims against Stability AI

Defending the realm: How a key MoD supplier crafts its IP strategy

How IP firms can champion LGBTQ+ staff beyond Pride 2025

BREAKING: Key post-sale confusion ruling ‘welcomed’ by brand owners

A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion

What is an ‘AI training declaration’ and who might need one?

Vidal: Settled expectations factor is ‘unconstitutional overreach’

How to handle the ‘wild west’ of generative AI: part 2

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles