shutterstock_726225325_kittisak_jirasittichai
2 February 2021PatentsRoberto Dini

How to end the abuse of litigation in SEP licensing

In recent decades, the value of intangible assets has consistently increased. In particular, IP rights came to be the engine of the knowledge economy, by incentivising the development of breakthrough technologies. In addition, IP rights themselves became a discrete and quantifiable business as companies leveraged their value via IP sales and licences.

Selling and licensing IP rights—patents in particular—is difficult because the value that the end user is able to experience is not easily calculated. The pricing of ever more complex and feature-rich end user products can result in friction between patent owners and implementers, who have to pay royalties to use the patented technology in a consumer product.

SEP and FRAND commitments

This friction is especially evident in the case of standard-essential patents (SEPs). These are patents that the innovator commits to license on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms. The patent owner also undertakes a FRAND assurance before a standard-setting organisation (SSO).

This assurance acts as a promise to renounce the monopoly conferred by the patent right, giving access to a certain patented technology on FRAND terms. The implementer, who is obliged to use those SEPs because they are mandatory to implement a certain standardised technology, benefits from this contractual relationship between the patent owner and the SSO as a third-party beneficiary.

However, it is important to note that the implementer has to be willing to take a licence under FRAND terms. If not, the patent owner has no FRAND licensing obligations, and instead enjoys the customary remedies available to the owner of a monopoly right, including injunctive relief. Thus, the FRAND licence is a two-way street, with duties incumbent on both the patent owner and the implementer.

The rise of SEP litigation

In today’s market, technologies are complex and products increasingly feature-rich. Mobile phones are no longer just used for making calls, but rather offer a myriad of other functions to their users, such as internet access, geolocation and photography. The same is happening in the automotive industry, where cars can now communicate with devices and users.

This increased functionality available to the end user has led to an increase in the number of SEPs, which protect the right of the innovators who make such features available on the market.

An unprecedented number of standards are under development and ever more technical contributions are made to those standards. There were almost six times more SEPs declared in 2017 than in 2002. Litigation concerning these patents also increased, resulting in almost nine times more litigated SEPs over the same period of time (Figure 1).

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
26 November 2020   The European Commission has promised to “reduce frictions” and bring down the level of litigation surrounding standard-essential patent licensing in the auto industry.
article
18 November 2020   Successfully maintaining the licensee-licensor relationship through a crisis means both sides making concessions, Aislinn Burton explains.
Patents
12 February 2021   An EU expert group on standard-essential patents has failed to reach a consensus on the future of SEP licensing, drawing criticism from both sides of the debate between SEP owners and implementers.