Commission targets SEP litigation in auto sector
Licensing in a Crisis: Treat it Like a Marriage
Kittisak Jirasittichai / Shutterstock.com
Some implementers are engaging in hold-out tactics to delay having to take a licence to SEPs, argues Roberto Dini of Sisvel.
In recent decades, the value of intangible assets has consistently increased. In particular, IP rights came to be the engine of the knowledge economy, by incentivising the development of breakthrough technologies. In addition, IP rights themselves became a discrete and quantifiable business as companies leveraged their value via IP sales and licences.
Selling and licensing IP rights—patents in particular—is difficult because the value that the end user is able to experience is not easily calculated. The pricing of ever more complex and feature-rich end user products can result in friction between patent owners and implementers, who have to pay royalties to use the patented technology in a consumer product.
This friction is especially evident in the case of standard-essential patents (SEPs). These are patents that the innovator commits to license on fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) terms. The patent owner also undertakes a FRAND assurance before a standard-setting organisation (SSO).
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at firstname.lastname@example.org
FRAND, patent, court, licensing, litigation, licence, Sisvel, owner, Huawei, technology, Unwired, Planet, Wuhan, Xiaomi, Samsung, hold-out, InterDigital