EFF asks SCOTUS to clarify Oracle v Google
Federal Circuit revives Oracle v Google copyright clash
Jonathan Weiss / Shutterstock.com
The US Supreme Court put its weight behind fair use, leaving the protection of software for another day, says Victor Johnson of Dykema.
After more than a decade of litigation regarding copyright in application programming interfaces (API), the US Supreme Court, in a 6-2 decision, decided what many believe is one of the most important copyright lawsuits in recent memory.
The court was facing two issues: (1) are APIs copyrightable subject matter, and (2) if so, did Google infringe Oracle’s copyright in its API when if copied portions of the declaring code.
Overturning the lower court’s ruling, the majority avoided answering the first and issued a narrow ruling that held that Google had made a fair use of a small portion of Oracle's code (versus copying of to create a new product that was “consistent with that creative 'progress' that is the basic constitutional objective of copyright itself”.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at firstname.lastname@example.org
Google, Oracle, Dykema, software protection, US Supreme Court, litigation, copyright, APIs, subject matter, programming, code, Android