Wrestler’s likeness suit vs Epic Games, Microsoft KO’d by SCOTUS
The US Supreme Court has refused to hear arguments against Fortnite developer Epic Games and Microsoft for allegedly copying the likeness of a professional wrestler in the video game series ‘Gears of War’.
Justices for the Supreme Court denied former wrestler and athlete Lenwood Hamilton’s writ of certiorari on Monday, June 21.
He claimed the companies had based the character ‘Cole Train’ off his old wrestling personality ‘Hard Rock Hamilton’, violating his right of publicity.
Hamilton claimed that Cole and Hamilton share “broadly similar faces, hair styles, races, skin tones and large, muscular body builds,” in addition to similar voices.
He also noted that ‘Cole Train’ was played by Hamilton’s former wrestling mate Lester Speight, who had input into the character's appearance and voice.
The petition before the Supreme Court sought an answer to whether the First Amendment right to free speech outweighs using a person’s likeness without permission and whether the amendment protects a game maker’s unauthorised use of a person’s face and voice.
“This is an issue of extreme importance now that technological advances allow anyone to manipulate a person’s face and voice digitally,” the petition said.
‘Transformative’ use
The lawsuit was first brought before the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in 2017.
Microsoft, Epic Games and Lester Speight moved for a summary judgment on the suit, to which the District Court agreed, citing case law in Hart v Elec Arts to conclude that the likeness of ‘Cole Train’ was transformative.
Hamilton then appealed to the Third Circuit, arguing that there is a “narrow free speech right” when concerning someone's likeness. The Third Circuit’s unpublished decision reportedly relied on the ruling in Hart v Elec Arts and “offered no assistance, further explanation or limitation” according to Hamilton’s petition.
Did you enjoy reading this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox
Today’s top stories
Arthrex: ‘patents have become more political’
BREAKING: SCOTUS says IPRs should be reviewable in Arthrex; hands more power to USPTO director
