olegalbinsky-istockphoto-com-us-supreme-court--1

24 April 2018Patents

US Supreme Court holds IPRs to be constitutional

Inter partes reviews (IPRs) do not violate the US Constitution and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board has authority to invalidate patents.

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

Patents

US Supreme Court SAS ruling: a ‘mess’ for IPRs

25 April 2018 Limiting the discretion of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board in relation to inter partes reviews is a game-changing decision which creates a procedural “mess”, one lawyer has claimed.

Patents

SCOTUS Oil States decision may raise more challenges to IPR: lawyers

25 April 2018 The US Supreme Court yesterday confirmed that inter partes reviews do not violate the US Constitution, but lawyers have told WIPR that more challenges to the IPR should be expected.

Patents

IPRs are constitutional, US government claims

25 October 2017 The US acting solicitor general has weighed in on a case being mulled over by the US Supreme Court over whether inter partes reviews (IPRs) are constitutional.

Tech litigators join Hogan Lovells’ Paris practice from A&O Shearman

How in-house patent pros are ‘enablers of innovation’

Smart IP for startups: how to avoid the common traps

Defending the realm: How a key MoD supplier crafts its IP strategy

How IP firms can champion LGBTQ+ staff beyond Pride 2025

WATCH: Synergy in science—navigating the landscape of pharmaceutical collaborations

AI patent trends signal tomorrow’s technologies

WATCH: Section 112 – Where has the dust settled?

US Supreme Court holds IPRs to be constitutional

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles