istock-476271055_fotovoyager-1
15 April 2020PatentsSarah Morgan

UPC membership ‘incompatible’ with future EU relations: UK IP minister

Membership of the Unified Patent Court (UPC) system is “incompatible” with the UK’s approach to future relations with the EU, said the UK’s IP minister in a letter confirming the country’s non-participation.

In late February, the  news broke that the UK would not be seeking involvement in the UPC, despite the ratification of the underlying agreement in April 2018.

However, at the time, the UK Intellectual Property Office didn’t offer comment, with the confirmation of non-participation instead coming from a Number 10 spokesperson in late February.

The manner in which the decision was revealed prompted questions by peers during a House of Lords EU Justice Sub-Committee hearing on March 10.

As part of the questions, the sub-committee chair wrote to the IP Minister, Amanda Solloway, asking for confirmation that the UK would not be seeking involvement in the UPC system.

In her  reply, Solloway expanded on the government spokesperson’s explanation, which noted that “participating in a court that applies EU law and bound by the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) is inconsistent with our aims of becoming an independent self-governing nation”.

The government’s approach to negotiations with the EU, published on February 27, sets out the vision “for future cooperation between legally autonomous sovereign equals” said Solloway.

This approach ruled out any obligation for UK laws to be aligned with the EU's, or for the EU's institutions to have any jurisdiction in the UK, she added.

“Continued participation in the UPC would mean ceding jurisdiction over key patent disputes in the UK to a court that is bound to apply and respect the supremacy of EU law, including judgments of the CJEU,” said the letter.

Finally, Solloway confirmed that the government will not be seeking the UK’s continued participation in the UPC and unitary patent.

The UPC has also suffered a blow in Germany, with the German Federal Constitutional Court  upholding a constitutional complaint filed against the country’s UPC legislation in March.

Despite the ruling, the German government is  pushing for the project to go ahead.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox.

Today’s top stories

Fed Circuit vacates Ericsson’s $100m patent verdict against TCL

Concern for USPTO’s finances amid decline in filings

AB InBev v Heineken trial to begin as planned despite pandemic

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Patents
16 April 2020   Is the German constitutional court decision to declare the German ratification law on the UPC agreement null and void just a formality, or is there more to adapt in the UPC system? Tilman Müller-Stoy of Bardehle Pagenberg explores the possible outcomes for the court in Germany and beyond.
Patents
23 April 2020   The UK’s decision to exit the UPC and the manner in which it left have caused a mixture of disappointment and disbelief, as WIPR’s Tom Phillips discovers.
Patents
20 March 2020   The German Federal Constitutional Court has upheld the constitutional complaint filed against the country’s Unified Patent Court legislation, less than one month after the UK said it would not be seeking involvement in the system.