Helder Almeida / Shutterstock.com
As Richard Hacon begins his tenure at IPEC he is imposing a culture of strict deadlines in the interests of efficiency, as he tells WIPR.
To follow Birss, in charge of the Patents County Court before it was rebranded as IPEC, meant superseding a man whose dedication produced what was widely seen as a highly successful three-year tenure. However, the former IP barrister in London was unlikely to be fazed by the task.
Hacon’s career had taken him to the most senior English and European courts, where he represented tech titans such as Apple and biotech big guns including Biogen. IPEC, in contrast, is aimed mostly at small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), handling claims worth up to £500,000 ($856,000) and capping fines for losers at £50,000 ($85,600).
As Hacon explains, since he took the reins in January 2014 the court has become “extremely busy”, with figures showing that just 96 cases were submitted in 2010, and 152 were filed in 2011 before the figure rose to 170 the next year. In 2013, 95 disputes were filed, but this draft total is likely to be revised upwards and surpass 2012’s total.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@worldipreview.com
IPEC; Richard Hacon; Apple; England & Wales High Court.
