PTAB ‘almost always wrong’ on Fintiv trial dates, research reveals
03-11-2021
PTAB denies AutoStore review of Ocado robot patents
12-10-2021
09-03-2022
Sergey Kamshylin / Shutterstock.com
The board designated no precedential opinions last year—will 2022 play out any different, asks Rick Bisenius of Fish & Richardson.
After a relatively busy 2020 in which the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) designated over a dozen opinions as either precedential (11) or informative (4), the PTAB did not designate a single opinion as precedential or informative during the 2021 calendar year.
Many of the precedential and informative decisions from 2020 touched on the then-new concept that the status and anticipated trial date of a related district court or International Trade Commission (ITC) proceeding should weigh into the board’s decision to discretionarily deny an inter partes review (IPR) or post-grant review (PGR) petition under § 314(a).
Although the concept that the status of a related district court proceeding should weigh in favour of denying institution under the board’s discretion was first raised in 2018 in NHK Spring v Intri-Plex Techs, (IPR2018-00752), the six-factor test for application of discretionary denial based on a related proceeding was formalised in Apple v Fintiv (IPR2020-00019), which saw the paper authorising supplemental briefing to address the factors related to a co-pending parallel proceeding designated precedential in May 2020, followed by the Final Written Decision designated informative in July 2020.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at achoudhury@worldipreview.com
Patent Trial and Appeal Board, PTAB, inter partes review, Fintiv, post-grant review, patents