Federal Circuit hands Ford win over hybrid vehicle patent
The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed motor company Ford a win on Friday, after affirming a decision that a hybrid vehicle patent is obvious.
Hybrid technology company Paice owns US patent number 8,214,097, which the US Patent and Trademark Office found to be unpatentable.
The patent describes and claims a control strategy for hybrid vehicles.
Ford sought two inter partes reviews (IPRs) of the ‘097 patent.
In one, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) determined that claims 1–6, 8–16, 18–26, 28–30, and 34 are unpatentable for obviousness, while in the other, the board determined that claims 30–33, 35, 36, and 39 are unpatentable for the same reason.
Paice appealed, claiming that the board had misconstrued several claim terms and made “insufficiently supported” factual findings in arriving at the obviousness determinations.
The hybrid technology company argued that the board had erred in construing “setpoint” to mean a “predetermined torque value that may or may not be reset”.
But the court disagreed, explaining that it had recently affirmed the same construction of “setpoint” by the PTAB in a related IPR proceeding involving another Paice patent in the same family as the ‘097 patent.
“Given the relationship of the patents, we affirm the board’s construction here as well,” said Circuit Judge Richard Taranto, on behalf of the court.
Paice also claimed that the PTAB had incorrectly read the first group of claim elements as “unrelated requirements”.
“But neither the language of claim 1 nor the language of the other claims at issue requires the simultaneous control urged by Paice so as to make the board’s reading incorrect under the broadest reasonable interpretation standard,” said the court.
It affirmed the PTAB’s decision.
In early March, WIPR reported that the US International Trade Commission had launched an investigation into Ford’s hybrid electric vehicles, following a patent complaint from Paice.
The complaint, which has not been decided yet, alleged infringement of the ‘097 patent, among others.
Join us for a FREE webinar— Navigating the CRISPR IP landscape in Europe—on April 25th.
Today’s top stories
Nikon wages war on ASML over lithography technology
Uber and Lyft sued for patent infringement
Diageo and Sazerac settle trademark dispute
Alibaba tip-off sees $2.9m worth of fake cosmetics seized
McGuireWoods adds partner in Washington
Did you enjoy reading this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk