shutterstock_1164053686-steve_heap
23 August 2023PatentsMarisa Woutersen

Marlboro maker seeks import ban on rival’s vape products

Dispute concerns patented e-vaporiser devices | Complaints, filed at the US International Trade Commission and a US district court, mark the latest stage in the duo’s long-running feud.

Marlboro maker Altria and its subsidiary NJOY have launched legal proceedings against JUUL Labs, aiming to secure a ban on JUUL's e-vapour products in the US.

A complaint filed by NJOY with the US International Trade Commission (ITC) seeks to stop the importation and sale of specific JUUL e-vapour offerings, including its signature JUUL device and JUULpods.

The complaint rests on NJOY's assertion that JUUL products unlawfully infringe upon patents concerning electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), owned by NJOY.

“Protecting our IP is critical to achieving our vision,” said Murray Garnick, executive vice president and general counsel at Altria.

“JUUL has infringed upon our patents through the sale of its imported products, and we ask the ITC to impose appropriate remedies in response to these trade violations.”

JUUL Labs commented: “We stand behind our intellectual property and will continue to pursue our infringement claims. “

NJOY's e-cigarette product is designed to resemble a traditional cigarette but is disposable, whereas its e-vapour product is a pod-based vapourised system which includes a reusable, rechargeable electronic component and disposable pod.

A district court lawsuit

Simultaneously, NJOY filed a patent infringement complaint against JUUL at the US District Court for the District of Delaware.

The complaints contend that JUUL's imported offerings, including their JUUL device and pods, infringe upon US patent numbers 11,497,864 and 10,334,881.

These patents, procured by NJOY from Fuma following the resolution of a patent infringement lawsuit, describe electronic vaporiser devices that use cartridges containing a nicotine solution.

NJOY currently offers two commercial product lines, including NJOY Daily—a disposable electronic cigarette, and NJOY ACE—a pod vaporiser device.

NJOY ACE, the product in the dispute, is the only product to have gained marketing authorisation from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The FDA's endorsement validates the product's alignment with public health priorities.

Smoking guns

This is not the first time JUUL and NJOY have gone head-to-head in a legal dispute.

In June, JUUL and VMR Products collectively filed a patent infringement complaint against NJOY and Altria alleging the infringement of multiple patents related to ENDS tech.

The complaint, filed at the US District Court for the District of Arizona, involved JUULs proprietary technologies covered by US patent numbers: RE49,114; 10,130,123; 10,709,173; 11,134,722; and 11,606,981.

According to the complaint, NJOY allegedly infringed these patents by producing vaporiser devices, cartridges, and associated components that employ the patented technology without authorisation.

JUUL and VMR claimed that NJOY induced and contributed to the infringement of the patents by leveraging its knowledge of the patents and its alleged active promotion of infringing products.

The suit also argued that NJOY contributed to infringement by providing or selling the accused products, even if separately offered as the ACE Device and ACE Pods.

This story has been updated since publication to include comment from JUUL Labs.

Did you enjoy reading this story?  Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories sent like this straight to your inbox

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

article
24 March 2016   Philip Morris, which owns the cigarette brand Marlboro, has lost a domain name dispute against a French national at the World Intellectual Property Organization.
Trademarks
1 February 2013   Australia’s Tobacco Plain Packaging Act places the harshest restrictions yet on how tobacco companies display their trademarks. WIPR looks at the IP issues surrounding this new law and the implications for brand owners.