Japan jurisdiction report: Policies for better service
At the beginning of 2018, Abe revealed his “Japan Productivity Revolution” policy, which included actively promoting artificial intelligence and other new technologies, and requiring the JPO to provide better services to applicants and to owners of IP rights. Despite this, Japan’s productivity is the one of the worst of the world’s developed counties.
Set forth below are policy initiatives that, although still under deliberation by government officials, when put into practice will be very important and will yield beneficial results for current and future applicants for, and owners of, IP rights being processed by the JPO.
Promoting the use of IP by SMEs
This is the area where Japan is placing the most effort. Small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) account for only about 15% of the total number of patent applications submitted in Japan by Japanese applicants.
More utilisation of IP by small companies is desired, because the Japanese government believes that the “Production Revolution” will enhance the technical strength of small Japanese businesses.
The following measures help to achieve that objective:
Extend the grace period regarding lack of novelty from six months to one year
In Japan, to avoid a refusal based on lack of novelty, a patent application must be filed within six months after the subject invention has been discussed in a printed publication, academic presentation, or the like. What is necessary, therefore, is to adopt a major amendment of Japan’s patent law to extend that period to one year, as in the US and Korea.
Cut patent application fees in half for small businesses
Governmental officials in Japan are currently discussing whether a measure to reduce patent-related fees should be limited to Japanese businesses only, or whether fees should be reduced according to the size of businesses, similar to the US’s reduced fee system for small entities.
It is expected that such a reduction of fees will result in more applications by SMEs, both from Japanese enterprises and from foreign businesses that are interested in the Japanese market.
Expanding the IP dispute-resolution processes
This requires the strengthening of evidence-gathering processes. When a court orders the submission of documents, for example, for conducting IP litigation, the court must be able to decide not only which documents need to be submitted, but also to make at its discretion decisions regarding such submission issues, as well as the final case decision and rulings regarding what materials, such as trade secrets, are to be revealed or not in open court.
It is also necessary to further clarify and strengthen the court’s ability to determine when, how, and to what extent impartial third-party experts are to be involved in litigation cases, and how to make best use of their expertise.
IP disputes are intensifying internationally and it is expected that Japan’s IP dispute-resolution processes will benefit from such international experience.
Enhancing the convenience of JPO procedures for applicants and others
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk