Some major changes to damage claims for patent infringement have been made under Taiwan’s newly amended Patent Act.
Subjective element of patent infringement
The civil remedy of patent infringement in the old Patent Act has been categorised into “damage claim” and “removal/prevention of infringement”. According to the Civil Code, the infringer’s intent or negligence is clarified as a prerequisite for a “damage claim”, while “removal/prevention of infringement” is similar to the removal and prevention of interference in the right of claim for tangible objects.
Consistent with the rationale of damage claims under the Civil Code, the new Patent Act clarifies that, for the “removal or prevention of patent infringement” factual infringing acts or likelihood of infringement are deemed sufficient, regardless of the infringer’s subjective element. For claiming damages, however, the patentee should further prove that the infringer has intent or is negligent of the alleged patent infringement.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at firstname.lastname@example.org
damages, patent infringement, Taiwan Patent Act