Fed Circ overturns TTAB in colour trade dress ruling
Insurance company challenges Deutsche Telekom’s ‘monopoly’ over colour pink
Kardash / Shutterstock.com
In early April, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit handed a small but significant victory to trademark owners in a case involving colour marks for product packaging. Andrea Anderson of Holland & Hart reports.
A “double bind” is an apt way to describe the challenges faced by brand owners seeking to establish rights in the colour scheme of their packaging when launching a new product. For the most part, the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) has refused to register such asserted marks absent a showing of acquired distinctiveness (sometimes called “secondary meaning”).
However, brand owners can’t establish acquired distinctiveness until after their product becomes commercially successful and well-recognised. And by that time, the packaging colour scheme may have been so copied and knocked-off that the brand owner cannot establish the “substantially exclusive use” also necessary for acquired distinctiveness.
As a practical matter, this “double bind” has precluded federal trademark registration for many packaging colour marks—until now.
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at firstname.lastname@example.org
colour trademarks, packaging, USPTO, colours, Forney Industries, Andrea Anderson, Holland & Hart, brand owners,