New arguments in light of a 2011 decision from the International Trade Commission raise questions about the extraterritorial application of US law, as Mark Wine explains.
US courts have long abided by the policy that “foreign conduct is generally the domain of foreign law”. In fact, in some areas of the law, the Supreme Court has even created strong legal presumptions against extraterritorial enforcement.
However, TianRui Group Co Ltd v US Int’l Trade Comm’n (TianRui) is emerging as an exception to this rule for matters involving trade secret misappropriation. TianRui’s broad holding has extended the extraterritorial reach of the International Trade Commission (ITC), using the “unfair competition” language in Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. In TianRui, the Federal Circuit affirmed the ITC’s jurisdiction over matters involving trade secret misappropriation, even in cases where the misappropriation occurs entirely overseas.
“IT BECOMES IMPORTANT FOR ENTITIES ENGAGED IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE WITH US-BASED COMPETITION TO UNDERSTAND THE POTENTIAL REACH OF THE DECISION’S REASONING REGARDING OTHER FORMS OF EXTRATERRITORIAL ENFORCEMENT.”
The rest of this article is locked for subscribers only. Please login to continue reading.
If you don't have a login, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content. Please use this link and follow the steps.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription to us that we can add you to for FREE, please email Atif Choudhury at firstname.lastname@example.org
TianRui v ITC, US law, unfair competition, trade secrets