WIPR survey: UPC won’t be operational by December 2017
The Unified Patent Court (UPC) is unlikely to become operational by December 2017, as predicted, according to nearly three-quarters of WIPR readers.
In January, WIPR reported that the UPC preparatory committee announced that the court can become operational in December this year.
And one reader said: “I have confidence that the UPC will be operational in December but uncertainties related to Brexit diminish its use.”
But most readers weren’t quite as optimistic. One major spanner in the works, they said, is Brexit.
UK Prime Minister Theresa May’s Brexit speech in January sparked concerns that the UK may seek to leave the UPC after Brexit.
“We do not seek to hold on to bits of membership as we leave,” said May, setting out a 12-step plan that the UK government will use for negotiating Brexit terms.
One reader said: “If ‘Brexit means Brexit’, it’s simply ridiculous nonsense to keep just the UPC.”
Another explained that the UPC becoming operational in December should require an understanding of how the UK will want to “smoothly” exit the UPC after one-and-a-half years, as the nation is predicted to have left the EU by 2019.
They added that there will be no such plan until May 2017.
Although the preparatory committee also confirmed that judicial interviews can begin and “appointments eventually confirmed”, one reader believed that it would be questionable whether the contracts with the judges would all be set by December.
“They need to include complicated provisions for part-time employment of public officers and pensions. In addition, the IT infrastructure is far from being ready,” they added.
That’s not the only worry—despite the UK announcing that it would ratify the agreement, concerns remain over whether Germany will ratify.
According to some readers, there is too much “political standoffishness” between Germany and the UK, with worries that Germany will hold off ratification for political reasons.
One reader was more optimistic: “There is now unstoppable momentum amid rising diplomatic efforts. The UK will not stand in the way. Germany will come under great pressure to complete ratification procedures this spring.”
Another added that “barring an unlikely legislative intervention by hard-line Brexit MPs in the UK, the UK’s ratification instrument will be submitted on time”.
For this week’s question, we ask: Last week, sister site LSIPR reported that the US Supreme Court ruled that supplying a single component of a multi-component invention for manufacture abroad does not constitute patent infringement. Do you think that was the right decision?
Did you enjoy reading this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox.
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk