The US government has urged the US Supreme Court to vacate decisions in the Halo v Pulse and Stryker v Zimmer cases arguing that the test applied by courts to determine wilful infringement is too restrictive.
To continue reading, you need a subscription to WIPR. Start a subscription to WIPR for £455.
In-house feature articles, the archive and expert comment require a paid subscription. Subscribe now.
Want to give it a try? We are offering a two week free trial to the WIPR website – register and select “Free Trial” to begin access to the full WIPR archive and read the latest news, features and expert comment. Begin your free trial here.
Is your 2 week free trial about to end? Upgrade to a 12 month subscription for £455 now.
If you have already subscribed please login.
If you have any technical issues please email tech support.
US Solicitor General; US Supreme Court; US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; wilful infringement; patents; Halo v Pulse; Stryker v Zimmer