shutterstock-168902726-web
Martin Good / Shutterstock.com
31 July 2014Trademarks

Thomas Pink beats Victoria’s Secret in ‘Pink’ trademark battle

UK shirt maker Thomas Pink has won a trademark battle against lingerie company Victoria’s Secret over the use of the word ‘pink’.

In a judgment handed down today, July 31, at the English High Court, Justice Colin Birss ruled that Victoria’s Secret’s use of the word on its goods infringed Thomas Pink’s trademark.

Thomas Pink filed a lawsuit in May last year, claiming the use of the word ‘pink’ by the US company when it launched its Pink brand in the UK in 2012 could mislead customers.

Birss agreed and said Victoria’s Secret aimed to have a “sexy, mass market appeal” and that consumers in Europe may be in danger of associating the two brands.

He added that the confusion could cause consumers to expect to find lingerie in Thomas Pink stores and be “surprised” when they did not find any.

In a statement, Jonathan Heilbron, president and chief executive of Thomas Pink, said he was “delighted” with the outcome.

“We will continue to protect the considerable investment that has been made into building Thomas Pink into a leading luxury clothing brand,” he added.

Despite the judgment, Tom Carl, senior associate at Taylor Wessing LLP, said the case would not open the door for other fashion brands to monopolise colour names.

“Thomas Pink’s trademark is only registered in a specific logo form—not the word itself—and the court held that it was only valid due to having ‘acquired distinctiveness’ among consumers, having been used as a brand since the company opened its doors in 1984,” Carl said.

Carl added that the judgment did not give Thomas Pink a complete monopoly on the colour pink.

“There were a number of specific factors in this case, and other scenarios will have to be considered on a case-by-case basis. For example, Victoria’s Secret was not just using the word pink on its clothing—it had also launched stores under that name,” Carl said.

Thomas Pink and Victoria’s Secret are also disputing the rights to the name in the US, where the underwear maker has asked a US court to issue a declaratory judgment of non-infringement.

Victoria’s Secret did not respond immediately to a request for comment.

Already registered?

Login to your account

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
10 January 2018   Premium lingerie designer Victoria’s Secret is being sued by fashion and lifestyle brand Love Made for infringing the trademark ‘Love Made Me Do It’.
Trademarks
12 November 2021   Health and fitness company IFIT has sued Victoria’s Secret Stores for allegedly infringing its “SWEAT” trademarks.