• Latest
    • AI
    • Careers
    • Diversity
    • Future of IP
    • Law firm news
    • Standard-essential patents
    • Trade secrets
    • Unified Patent Court
  • Patents
  • Trademarks
  • Copyright
  • Jurisdiction reports
  • Rankings
    • About Rankings
    • China Rankings
    • Germany Rankings
    • Global Rankings
    • UK Rankings
    • USA Rankings
    • Diversity & Inclusion Top 100 2025
    • Leaders 2025
    • Company Directory
  • WIPR Insights
    • Magazines
    • Whitepapers
  • Events
    • Conferences
    • Conference Videos
    • Webinars
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Newsletter
  • Login


Subscribe
  • Home
  • Copyright
  • SCOTUS refuses to hear ‘Dancing baby’ copyright dispute
istock-579149532_moussa81
20 June 2017Copyright

SCOTUS refuses to hear ‘Dancing baby’ copyright dispute

The US Supreme Court has refused to hear the ‘Dancing baby’ copyright dispute, a case centring on a video of a child dancing to Prince’s “Let’s Go Crazy” that was uploaded to YouTube.

Already registered?

Login to your account


If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.

For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.

To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.

Two Weeks Free Trial

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk


More on this story

Copyright
Music stops in ‘Dancing baby’ case
2 July 2018   A year after the US Supreme Court refused to hear the ‘Dancing baby’ copyright dispute, the matter has been resolved amicably.


Editor's picks

Netlist’s IP head: External counsel ‘should understand our business goals’
Patents
Netlist’s IP head: External counsel ‘should understand our business goals’
11 July 2025

Editor's picks

Patents
Netlist’s IP head: External counsel ‘should understand our business goals’
11 July 2025
Artificial Intelligence
Stability attacks Getty’s ‘confected’ case in closing arguments
3 July 2025
Patents
New WIPR Rankings spotlight UK legal market for patents work
3 July 2025
Trademarks
Ferrari wins Testarossa classic car case at EU court
2 July 2025
Patents
‘We created law’: G1/24 and the creation of the ‘diamond standard’
1 July 2025
Patents
A step too far? Why Stewart’s approach is dividing opinion
20 June 2025

More articles

Why the ITC is a friendlier forum for patent litigation
Netlist’s IP head: External counsel ‘should understand our business goals’
EU takes fight to genAI in tough week for Big Tech
Chicago firm Much Shelist adds partner with ‘entrepreneurial mindset’
Kilpatrick adds ‘seasoned, versatile litigator’ as trademark partner
AI and IP USA 2025: Future-proofing event aims at intersection of technology and law
F-AI-R use: Lessons on genAI training in Anthropic and Meta
SPEX appeals Western Digital’s $1 slashed damages verdict

  • Home
  • News
  • Directory
  • About us
  • Contact
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use
  • Terms of Subscription

WIPR
Newton Media Ltd
Kingfisher House
21-23 Elmfield Road
BR1 1LT
United Kingdom

  • Twitter
  • Linkedin