Nintendo takes on ‘Poké Go’ trademark in opposition
Nintendo of America, the US subsidiary of video games maker Nintendo, has opposed a trademark filed by an Oklahoma-based couple looking to use the name ‘Poké Go’ for clothing.
In July last year, Mark and Michelle Gorell filed the trademark for use in class 25 at the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
The trademark was published for opposition in December 2016.
Nintendo filed its notice of opposition on Wednesday, April 19, claiming that if the trademark was registered it would be confusingly similar, cause dilution by blurring and tarnishment, and would be deceptive.
The company owns a number of ‘Poké’ related trademarks that have been registered since 2000.
These include a variety of ‘Pokémon’ related marks used on clothing and electronics known as its “Poké family”.
Nintendo stated in the notice that because the filing dates and first use of its Poké family of marks predate that of the defendants, “Nintendo’s rights are senior to those of the applicants”.
The video games maker added that the related nature of the goods and similarity between the use and registration of the term ‘Poké Go’ are likely to cause confusion or deception that they are endorsed or approved by Nintendo.
A search of the US trademark register for Nintendo’s Poké family of marks reveals approximately 60 registrations and applications with the Poké prefix.
These include a variety of Pokémon Go related trademarks filed in March 2016, ahead of the game’s release in July of that year.
Nintendo claimed that use of ‘Poké Go’ by the defendant “is likely to cause dilution of the distinctive quality of Poké trademarks by tarnishment and blurring in view of Nintendo’s long and extensive prior use”.
When contacted by WIPR, Nintendo said it had "nothing to announce on the topic".
Join us for TODAY at 4pm BST for a FREE webinar— Navigating the CRISPR IP landscape in Europe
Today’s top stories
Apple v Samsung: $400m design patent dispute rumbles on
H&M and Deckers settle UGG trade dress and patent suit
Hyundai Mobis in mixed patent ruling at Federal Circuit
Arnstein & Lehr hires partner in Chicago
Did you enjoy reading this story? Sign up to our free daily newsletters and get stories like this sent straight to your inbox
Already registered?
Login to your account
If you don't have a login or your access has expired, you will need to purchase a subscription to gain access to this article, including all our online content.
For more information on individual annual subscriptions for full paid access and corporate subscription options please contact us.
To request a FREE 2-week trial subscription, please signup.
NOTE - this can take up to 48hrs to be approved.
For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk