9 November 2015Copyright

‘Monkey selfie’ lawsuit is no laughing matter, argues UK photographer

“Monkey see, monkey sue is not good law” was the argument put forward by UK photographer David Slater in his opposition to a copyright lawsuit filed by the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA).

Already registered?

For multi-user price options, or to check if your company has an existing subscription that we can add you to for FREE, please email Adrian Tapping at atapping@newtonmedia.co.uk

More on this story

IP rights for animals is an argument for Congress, not courts, judge tells PETA

1 February 2016 A US court has ordered the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals to take its ‘monkey selfie’ argument to Congress after it dismissed a complaint asserting that a Macaque ape should own the copyright to a photo it took of itself.

‘Monkey selfie’ copyright claim rejected

7 January 2016 A US court has dismissed a claim filed by the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals in which the organisation claimed that the copyright to the ‘monkey selfie’ photograph should belong to a macaque ape.

‘All it takes is a post on Truth Social’: Is this patent reform's moment?

Vidal supports IPR petition for first time against ‘settled expectations’

Weil continues expansion with top trade secrets litigator

Why my Midjourney AI case is one to watch’: Cleary partner on a potential ‘art styles’ first

Kilpatrick gains ‘high-calibre’ litigator in San Francisco

Microsoft counsel: Knowing your value is the real edge in an AI world

Paddington Bear’s ‘challenging’ action over drug-addled parody

Chanel bags partial EU win, but stalls in NYC

‘Monkey selfie’ lawsuit is no laughing matter, argues UK photographer

More on this story

Editor's picks

Editor's picks

More articles